World Lit Only By Fire Audi Book

  1. World Lit Only By Fire Audiobook -
  2. World Lit Only By Fire Audi Booking
  3. World Lit Only By Fire Audiobook Youtube

A World Lit Only By Fire is William Manchester's attempt to write a book of popular history defending the increasingly unpopular view among historians that the medieval world was culturally, religiously, and technologically backward. A World Lit Only By Fire: The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance, Portrait of an Age (Audio) by William Manchester, read by Barrett Whitener and Carrington MacDuffie (1992, 11:36, 320 pages in paperback, listened Mar 30-April 9, June 7-8) Rating: 2 stars Manchester tells us the the early 16th century is not his specialty, that he had written. William Manchester was a hugely successful popular historian and biographer whose books include The Last Lion, Volumes 1 and 2, Goodbye Darkness, A World Lit Only by Fire, The Glory and the Dream, The Arms of Krupp, American Caesar, The Death of the President, and assorted works of journalism. A World Lit Only by Fire. MP3 audiobook ISBN: 140 File size: 335158 KB Release date: March 1, 2007 Duration: 11:37:02 Number of parts: 10. Read 'A World Lit Only by Fire The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance - Portrait of an Age' by William Manchester available from Rakuten Kobo. A 'lively and engaging' history of the Middle Ages (Dallas Morning News) from the acclaimed historian William Manchester.

A World Lit only By Fire
AuthorWilliam Manchester
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SubjectHistory 1
PublisherLittle, Brown and Company; A Back Bay Book (paperback)
1992; 1993 Paperback
Media typePrint (Hardback, Paperback)
Pages322 (Paperback)
ISBN0-316-54531-7 (1st edition)=ISBN0-316-54556-2 (pb)
OCLC243729651
940.2/1 20
LC ClassCB369 .M36 1992

A World Lit Only by Fire (subtitled The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance: Portrait of an Age) is an informal history of the European Middle Ages by American historian William Manchester. Published in 1992, the book is divided into three sections: 'The Medieval Mind', 'The Shattering', and 'One Man Alone'. In the book, Manchester scathingly posits, as the title suggests, that the Middle Ages were ten centuries of technological stagnation, short-sightedness, bloodshed, feudalism, and an oppressive Church wedged between the golden ages of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance.

Contents[edit]

In the book's 'Author's Note', Manchester says, 'It is, after all, a slight work, with no scholarly pretensions. All the sources are secondary, and few are new; I have not mastered recent scholarship on the early sixteenth century.'[1]

'The Medieval Mind' extensively covers notable occurrences centered in approximately the year 500, including a description of the fall of the Roman Empire. The book further delineates the Dark Ages that immediately followed the collapse of the Roman Empire, including details regarding a number of adverse events that were characteristic of what Manchester regards as a 'stark' era. It includes commentary on St. Augustine and the effects he had on medieval civilization. It talks about the overall ignorance of the masses during this time period.

The second section of the book, 'The Shattering', is the book's longest section, expanding upon a number of events that Manchester regards as embodying the end of the Middle Ages as well as the early period of the Renaissance. It relates extensive anecdotes regarding a pope from the formidable medieval Borgia family, Pope Alexander VI, focusing on his 'wild' celebrations and extensive nepotism, contrasted with a narrative centered around Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation. Continuing with his focus in regard to spirituality, Manchester writes on the rise of humanism in the early Renaissance days and its celebration of secularism over piety. The section further covers humanist scholars, and concentrates upon the humanist tendencies of Renaissance leaders such as Michelangelo and Leonardo. The European nobility of the era are also touched upon in chapters elaborately describing the life and decisions made by England's King Henry VIII. Henry's wives and eventual separation from the Church despite his being once an 'ardent Catholic' are treated extensively.

The final section of the work, 'One Man Alone', is a description of the voyage of the Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan, who circumnavigated the globe. The section expands upon the life and personality of Magellan and his eventual death in the Philippines in an attempt to convert the natives to Catholicism there. Manchester's argument is ultimately that Magellan's voyage was concurrent with and, on several levels, symptomatic of changing ways in which Renaissance people thought.

Reception[edit]

Only

A World Lit Only by Fire became a New York Times bestseller and was praised for its lively storytelling in some journalistic reviews. Ron Grossman of the Chicago Tribune, for instance, wrote that 'by taking readers along on Magellan's voyage, Manchester provides them with easy access to a fascinating age when our modern mentality was just being born.'[2]

Some professional historians, however, have dismissed or ignored the book because of accusations regarding numerous factual errors and its dependence on interpretations that have not been accepted by experts since the 1930s at the latest. In a review for Speculum, the journal of the Medieval Academy of America, Jeremy duQuesnay Adams remarked that Manchester’s work contained 'some of the most gratuitous errors of fact and eccentricities of judgment this reviewer has read (or heard) in quite some time.'[3] In particular, Adams pointed out that Manchester's claims about diet, clothing, and medieval people's views of time and their sense of self all ran counter to the conclusions of 20th-century historians of the Middle Ages. Manchester’s views on the transition from medieval to modern civilization, though they were popular in the 19th and early 20th century (and still are current in some segments of contemporary culture), have long been rejected by professional scholars in the relevant fields. Despite this, the book is often taught at the beginning of College Board's AP European History class.[4]

In 2014, the English industrial metal band Godflesh released an album named after Manchester's book.[5] Frontman Justin Broadrick found the brutality and bleakness of A World Lit Only by Fire inspiring.[5]

The book was also featured in a season 3 episode of Billy on the Street. Billy believed the book was written by 2 Chainz.

References[edit]

  1. ^Manchester, William. 'Author's Note', A World Lit Only By Fire
  2. ^Grossman, Ron (1992-06-24). 'A Look at the Day the Middle Ages Ended'. Chicago Tribune.
  3. ^Adams, Jeremy duQuesnay (January 1995). 'Review of William Manchester, A World Lit Only By Fire'. Speculum. 70 (1): 173–74. doi:10.2307/2864746. JSTOR2864746.
  4. ^The book is one of several choices recommended as summer reading in Mercado, Steven; Young, Jessica (2007). 'AP European History: Teacher's Guide'(PDF). College Board Advanced Placement Program. pp. 19–20.
  5. ^ ab'Godflesh: Entire 'A World Lit Only by Fire' Album Available for Streaming'. Blabbermouth.net. Retrieved 21 November 2018.

External links[edit]

World Lit Only By Fire Audiobook -

  • A staff report at the Straight Dope about Manchester's description of the Pied Piper of Hamelin as a pedophile and mass murderer.

World Lit Only By Fire Audi Booking

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_World_Lit_Only_by_Fire&oldid=1019146723'

World Lit Only By Fire Audiobook Youtube

  • Reviews(61)
  • Conversations(73)

by William Manchester

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations / Mentions
2,841613,690(3.59)1 / 73
date | votes
Showing 1-25 of 59 (next | show all)
Manchester's excellent work endeavors to make a modern reader understand the medieval person, the world they lived in, their psychology, their daily life, their fears and concerns. He expertly details the differences between our modern world and theirs by doing a case study of a couple of specific periods, then moving the work into the Italian Renaissance to show the reader how incredibly shocking everything that happened in the 'exploration age' was.
He devotes the last third of his book to his fascination with Ferdinand Magellan, which wasn't exactly what I wanted, but it was still insightful, interesting, and educational. You could do fine not reading that section if you wanted a shorter read more specific to the medieval period, since the sheer length and detail of his Magellan section makes the rest of the book feel oddly like his long, detailed prologue intended to set the stage for how interesting he finds this one historical character.. who is not a likable character at all. I'm sorry, Manchester, I'm just not into conquistadors. ( )
RNCoble | Mar 25, 2021 |
This is a pretty good book, but at best it's a distillation of portions of Arial (and William) Durants multi-volume work 'The History of Civilization'.
Dated stuff -- but still, good. I especially liked the stuff on the Borgia popes. ( )
wickenden | Mar 8, 2021 |
My initial foray into William Manchester's writings (he apparently authored 17 books prior to this one) was the unfortunately titled A World Lit Only by Fire: The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance: Portrait of an Age. Many of the books I read are found in the bibliographies of other books, but I believe I stumbled upon this one on Amazon and, like a candy bar at the drug store, it became an impulse purchase. I have an interest in medieval European history, as well as intellectual history more broadly, and the title sounded promising.
The title itself comes from a quote on page 199: 'In that age the world was still lit only by fire.' That literal fact held much in terms of metaphorical promise. But strangely, as Manchester states outright in a preliminary 'Author's Note' (which some readers may skip), the book itself began as an introduction to a friend's biography of Magellan, and Manchester wanted to provide some context, in a dozen pages or so. Of course there is no mention of this in the title, and if one doesn't read the Author's Note beforehand, one is riding along with an interesting overview of the medieval period until the subject turns to Magellan. The final chapter ('One Man Alone') is devoted to Magellan's search for a route to the Spice Islands, through the straits that now bear his name, ending in the Philippines.
It is all very interesting, though a bit disjointed. The book's cover says 'National Bestseller,' and that may indeed have been so (it was first published in 1992). But this book could have been so much better--at the very least hung with a more apropos title. To be fair, Manchester asserts that his book is 'a slight work, with no scholarly pretensions' (xiii). With that pretext in mind, the book is an enjoyable enough read; hence four stars, with the rating buttressed by the necessarily read Author's Note. A succinct chronology and solid bibliography provide bookends for the text. ( )
RAD66 | Nov 12, 2020 |
Interesting but disappointing. Although, the Medieval Mind is an excellent portend for the 1632 series. Great quote from the Magellan section; 'His character was, of course, imperfect. But heroes need not be admirable, and indeed most have not been. The web of driving traits behind their accomplishments almost assures that. Men who do the remarkable — heroic and otherwise — frequently fail in their personal relationships. This unpleasant reality is usually glossed over in burnishing the image of the great.” Compliments of bread2u. ( )
jamespurcell | Aug 15, 2020 |
This book was very different than expected based on the title.
I expected to find:
* Candles were expensive
* Tallow, vs paraffin vs other kinds of wax
* Oil lamps vs candles
* Who could afford artificial light and and who couldn’t
* How much artificial light was used
* What was used instead of artificial light
* How we got away from artificial light
* What life was like when artificial light was expensive.
The only one one that I found any hint of an answer to was the last one, and that only within the first 28 pages.
What I did find — not much, there were only three entries in the Table of Contents
* The Medieval Mind p. 1-28
* The Shattering: p. 29-220
* One Man Alone p. 221-292
The Medieval Mind section/chapter covered what a miserable short life the commoners lived.
The Shattering section/chapter described at length the debauchery of the church and royalty. After a dozen pages I got the point that at the highest levels sexual immorality and killing of opponents were rampant. It continued along that same line until finally getting to Luther and other reformers who although not sexually promiscuous, often preferred to kill their opponents. It goes on and on, but it’s the same story of self-centeredness and intolerance repeated over and over.
The last section is about Ferdinand Magellan and is probably the most interesting section. It concludes with some cogent comments about heroes and heroism. Here is a little bit. The conclusion was intriguing.
“Similarly, the soldier who throws himself on a live grenade, surrendering his life to save his comrades, may be aware the medal of honor. Nevertheless, his deed, bering impulsive is actually unheroic .. Heroism is the exact opposite — always deliberate, never mindless.” (Page 287)
“… it is difficult to find another figure whose heroism matches Magellan’s” (Page 288-289)
* Inviting charges of treason
* Unseaworthy ships
* Attempted sabotage against his expedition
* His hodgepodge crews couldn’t even communicate in the same tongue
* The background of the captains assigned to him almost guaranteed mutiny and treachery, which indeed followed
* Unable to confide in anyone else
* He persevered in his search for the strait
* It was his fortitude, his inflexible will which fueled morale and stamina
* His discovery of the Philippines dwarfed his original goal
“His character was, of course, imperfect. But heroes need not be admirable, and indeed most have not been. The web of driving traits behind their accomplishments almost assures that. Men who do the remarkable — heroic and otherwise — frequently fail in their personal relationships. This unpleasant reality is usually glossed over in burnishing the image of the great.” (Page 289)
( )
bread2u | Jul 1, 2020 |
Great companion book to assist me in historical background for reading Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall series; the last chapters on Magellan's circumnavigation of the globe was particularly riveting. ( )
BDartnall | May 16, 2020 |
Awesome, I couldn't stop, went through it in a couple of days.
It's just awesome and then it floors you with the story of Ferdinand Magellan. ( )
GirlMeetsTractor | Mar 22, 2020 |
What a terrible book. I don't know who or how the man who wrote this even claims to be a historian. This volume is a great example and/why people hate reading history. The bias tone is so overt and blatant that it smells. It is quite obvious that Manchester is talking out of his rear and has no clue about facts. Writers like this hurt good historians like, Asbridge, Jones, Bauer and others who dedicate their lives to history. The second half of the book is much better. The chapters on Luther are chaotic and at that point in the book you don't know if or how much smoke the writer is blowing up your rear. The last chapter regarding Magellan is exciting and heartbreaking at the same time. The book gets better after the first part but I think it, as all history, should be taken with a grain of salt. No historical perspective should be taken at face value.
Asbridge, Jones and Bauer are highly recommended writers in regards to History. They crush anything this writer has done. Asbridge is great for the Crusades, Jones is simply unstoppable in regards to general English History, and Bauer is probably the most well rounded historian I have ever read. Her three part series on the history of the world is ASTOUNDING and so much fun to read. ( )
1Joe73 | Oct 25, 2019 |
I stopped reading this at about the 1/2 mark. The book is is written in the vein of what I call 'Publisher's Books', ie. it's written for scandal, tantalization, the sudden shock with little regard to how well these one liners actually represent the era. I stopped and went to look at other reviews ( the book was in my library's digital collection and I picked it up as it might be interesting).
I am setting this book aside. I don't think I will finish it.
This review and comments reflect my own thoughts.
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4090326?book_show_action=true&from_rev..
I've read a number of books about the middle ages in the past couple of years, any are better than this and all are well received and praised.
Here is a short list of title I highly recommend
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13546411-the-time-traveler-s-guide-to-mediev..
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/568236.A_Distant_Mirror
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2062351.The_Early_Middle_Ages
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2203560.The_High_Middle_Ages
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4893641-the-late-middle-ages
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10954979-the-swerve
( )
yhgail | Feb 20, 2019 |
This history book is a fast and easy read, but I noticed some problems with it. One, the author states that he did no primary research- he didn’t do any digging into old manuscripts from monasteries, or find letters from 500 years ago. He *did*, however, bring a lot of it together into an engaging and accessible book. But there are more problems.
He shows only the bad side of the Middle Ages; in fact, he disparages it in some odd ways. One of his statements is “In the Medieval mind, there was no conception of time”- really? The monasteries certainly kept good calendars, the peasants knew when to plant for their crops to ripen in time, they knew how long it took for babies to be born, and when the saint’s special days were. No, they did not have clocks other than sundials or water clocks, but they certainly knew about the passage of time. He just about calls the people who lived in the medieval era a bunch of idiots that didn’t learn a thing for a thousand years. It’s true; the world was grim and brutal in those days, but it was not without learning.
He gets more enthusiastic when the Renaissance bursts on the scene and people start making long exploratory voyages- the entire back third of the book is about Magellan. He is also enthusiastic about the blossoming of protests against the Catholic Church- he delights in telling tales about Pope Alexander VI’s sexual antics and the selling of offices (he doesn’t have one good thing to say about the Catholic Church).
While I enjoyed the book, the fact that I found untruths in it made me wonder how many other untruths he was writing that I’m not enough of a history buff to catch. I means I cannot really trust anything he writes in this book. To explain the whole Medieval period and the beginnings of the Renaissance is a huge chore; even if he did the research he should have done, it would have been really difficult to explain it all in three hundred pages. I give it two stars, because it kept me entertained. ( )
lauriebrown54 | Jan 10, 2019 |
Controversial, yes, but (or maybe even 'thus'?) lots of useful background for translating fiction set in the Middle Ages.
LizoksBooks | Dec 15, 2018 |
Manchester's overview of world history in the Medieval and Renaissance eras is eminently readable. ( )
LyndaInOregon | Dec 14, 2018 |
The subtitle of this book, The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance, focuses attention on a point that often strikes my when I read tales of human history. People of the past weren't like us. They didn't think how we think. They didn't see themselves or the universe around them as we do. They seemed to lack humanity. Frankly, they seem nuts. In many ways their world was one that was ruled, if not predominately populated by, psychopaths. Between blood lust, selfish ambition, and religious fervor (often in deadly combination), I sometimes wonder how our species survived. In this book, the author focuses on a few historical events that helped change our medieval minds into ones that I like to think are a bit more human. ( )
DLMorrese | Aug 23, 2017 |
This book may be a fun read, but it is very outdated and inaccurate history. Universities with low academic standards will love this one. All historical research done in the last 100 years is ignored. The factual flaws in the first chapter alone were enough to make me check to see if it was fiction.
This book should be used as the BAD example when contrasting nonfiction books. I could not finish as it is an insult to real history. Point me to the nearest bonfire, please! ( )
1ikeman100 | May 11, 2017 |
This book covers a vast territory, the medieval world, the renaissance, the reformation, the age of exploration, too broad perhaps, but still enjoyable as all William Manchester books are. I particularly enjoyed his tale of Magellan's voyage. ( )
gbelik | Jan 30, 2017 |
This was an engagingly written book, and a very fast read. However, it suffered from a number of issues.
For one, it was too fast, and seemed to hop-scotch around; for instance, the last chapter on Magellan seems to just be tacked on. It seems that half of the the book before the Magellan chapter is bracket with 'Durant says, '; Manchester obviously relied very heavily on this one source.
Then, there are logical 'errors.' I put 'errors' in quotes because I am not an expert in Medieval history or the lives of the various figures, but there are a number of places where Manchester will, over the course of a few sentences or a paragraph, say something like, 'Commonly, A is labeled as B; but this is not true because C .. Now, certainly A was B, and so..' This may be his writing style, but I found it distracting and it has left me wondering about the veracity of what I read. Consulting Wikipedia, I see that in fact the book did spark controversy for its supposed errors and invalid conclusions, and that it was out of date. Going back to what I noticed, the book was published in 1992 but references very heavily books written between the 1930's and the 1960's (the Durants' series), which presumably itself was based on research from decades earlier..
Sigh.
Reading this very well may have been a waste of time. Check out From 'Dawn to Decadence' or 'The Civilization of the Middle Ages' The are both longer, but also both very good reads; and I trust them more. ( )
dcunning11235 | Oct 17, 2016 |
I look forward to listening to this audiobook again in the future. Manchester was a good story teller, but one that may be closer to historical fiction at times. ( )
MichaelC.Oliveira | Oct 7, 2016 |
I love the title of this book because the title alone starts your imagination to work picturing what life was really like in the Middle Ages. A very entertaining read. ( )
M_Clark | Apr 26, 2016 |
Unaware of the controversies over Manchester's scholarship (or lack thereof) on the middle ages, because I don't usually read this genre, I bought this book (2014 edition) for the beautiful cover, maps, and color illustrations.
oregonobsessionz | Apr 10, 2016 |
My first introduction to William Manchester's writing was his biography of Winston Churchill. I had read volimes 1 & 2 of Manchester's biography on Churchill and came across this book while waiting for the third and final Churchill volume to be published. Manchester writes history like a novelist, not dully. P.S., Unfortunately Manchester died before he wrote volume 3 to close out his Churchill biography. Nevertheless, reading only volumes 1 & 2 are worth the time .. just as 'A Wrold Lit Only by Fire.' ( )
trek520 | Dec 7, 2015 |
36. A World Lit Only By Fire : The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance, Portrait of an Age (Audio) by William Manchester, read by Barrett Whitener and Carrington MacDuffie (1992, 11:36, ~320 pages in paperback, listened Mar 30-April 9, June 7-8)
Rating: 2 stars
Manchester tells us the the early 16th century is not his specialty, that he had written up a short book on Magellan's voyage, then he wanted to put that in a background context of the times. It would have been nice if he had told us that up front instead of in the afterword.
What comes out has little to do with the title or subtitle. While it jumps around in time quite a bit, thereby actually touching most to the Middle Ages time period, it spends most of its time in the early 16th century. Over and over he reminds us how corrupt the Papacy was, then jumps to lengthy sections on Cesare & Lucretia Borgia, Martin Luther, finally Magellan's voyage. The reader is left wondering what context this should be read in and how it all ties together..until the afterword.
Perhaps Manchester's books on Churchill* are lightning, but this one is nothing special.
*He is the author of The Last Lion, a two volume biography of Winston Churchill.
2015
https://www.librarything.com/topic/191940#5203558( )
1dchaikin | Jul 3, 2015 |
Only got a short way into this book. The bias, inaccuracies and narrow focus put me off. I gather from other reviews that it is not well regarded by many historians.
1ritaer | Mar 11, 2015 |
I had wanted to read this book for years. It's about the Middle Ages! And with such a beautiful title! Had heard reviews saying there are factual errors, but with a time so long gone and so little recorded (I mean, it is called the Dark Ages, after all), you'd have to expect some disagreement. In exchange for a good overview of the era, I'd call it worthwhile.
I gave up on page 12-13: 'In an attempt to link Easter with the Passion, it was scheduled on Passover.. The decision had no historical validity, but neither did the event..' I've never heard any definition of Easter that did not include the Passion of Christ (nor does Manchester elaborate on this hypothetical event), and since all four gospels say this coincided with Passover, the scheduling seems much more slam-dunk than scheming.
Also, page 11 'The crafty but benevolent pagan gods - whose caprice and intransigence existed only in the imagination of Christian theologians'. How did Manchester read Homer without seeing gods behaving capriciously and intransigently?
More importantly, how could someone so totally ignorant of either the ancient traditions that preceded it, or the modern Christian tradition which succeeded it, ever hope to write a book about the Middle Ages and the Renaissance that came between, especially without taking a very scholarly approach to it? ( )
1Heduanna | Feb 15, 2015 |
It is useful as a compendium of every stereotype you can think of about the Middle Ages, most of them wrong ( )
2auldtwa1 | Mar 14, 2014 |
A great narrative of the 16th century in Europe ( )
deblemrc | Mar 1, 2014 |
Showing 1-25 of 59 (next | show all)

Quick Links

Audible(0 editions)
Project Gutenberg(0 editions)

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (3.59)
0.5 15
1 18
1.5 2
2 32
2.5 7
3 92
3.5 27
4 163
4.5 10
5 98

2 editions of this book were published by Hachette Book Group.

Minitool partition wizard 7 8. Editions: 0316545562, 0316545317

GenreThing